It would be <span>Some nations agreed to disarmament but some did not. Nations which has large armies and weapons usually doesn't agree in disarmament because it will give a strain and more effort are required to disband to follow the disarmament treaty. Also those nations who have an advantage in military power would not agree to lessen its power for the lesser power.</span>
Because it had a reputation as the most segregated city in the South
Mussolini's government has really changed the country, and Italy took part in the first world war. In 1920s there were also climate changes.
Get involved, be part of the community, let your voice and opinions be heard, vote!
The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.
It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.
It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.
