Hi there!
The case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1824 concerning the power of the states to regulate interstate commerce. This case involved a steamboat owner, Thomas Gibbons, who did business between New York and New Jersey and the then governor of New Jersey, Aaron Ogden. Gibbons argued that the monopoly Ogden had was a violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution and therefore not valid. This proved to be the case. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court decided that this law conflicted with federal law and the powers the federal government had to regulate interstate commerce. Under the Constitution, Congress has all powers necessary and proper to carry into effect the laws that it passes. This reinforced that clause.
Answer:
yes JUICE RIP REST IN PIECE ONE OF GREATEST RAPPERS OAT OF ALL TIME
Explanation:
U DONT DESERVE SUFFER IN THIS WORLD JUICE, GOD WANTS YOU TO BE THERE WITH HIM, WITH THE OTHER AMAZING PEOPLE
Deciding on which place to live during this time would have been better is subjective, but many would have preferred to live in the North due to increased output and economic opportunities.
Answer:
fur traders, merchants, medical professionals and carpenters
Explanation:
Westward Expansion generally had negative effects on the Native Americans. Native Americans were forced to live on reservations. The buffalo, an important resource, experienced rapid population decline. Military conflict between Whites and Native Americans resulted in many deaths.
