Mrs. Louis could ask Mr.Hollembeak for <em>further details about his findings and report.</em>
The discussion <em>aims to get the thruth</em> about a possible leak of information by not properly encrypted files. Mr. Hollembeak defends himself stating that concerning his knowledge and responsabilities he is innocent of any negligence for his department's security protocol was up to date.
If Mrs. Louis wants to be an effective participant in the discussion she could ask Mr.Hollembeak further details about his findings and report in order to discover any contradictions in his statement and then feel free to move to another topic.
I'd have to go with D because Romeo and Juliet can't be together because their families hate each other. They are defined by their family names and if they go together one of them would share the family name of the other.
So I don't believe that it is common, though I do believe that many can be commonly misinformed. It's not the event that is to be mistaken, instead it is more common to find a misdated event. Does that make sense? So the title or name of the event is not mistaken for another, but instead I believe the date or the event itself can be misinterpreted. Since, in order to know exactly what happened, you need to be there, and at the same time, there are many different perspectives. If you need further explanation, just let me know.
A grammatically correct sentence would say: Amanda already finished the test.
But I have a feeling you're just kidding bc of the point count.
