This should be a slippery slope logical fallacy.
That's when you start with a thing and swiftly move on to the consequences that may come from that thing and are usually negative. Here you have the slippery slope that if you don't do your homework, you are bound to fail and end up being a failure while it is not so in reality.
Answer:
to show the fight for independence is a spirtual stuggle
Explanation:
i think so
Answer:
Do children who take prekindergarten classes do better in school?
Explanation:
The rhetorical strategy that Wiesel is using in the passage is pathos.
<h3>What is rhetorical strategy?</h3>
It should be noted that a rhetorical strategy is the communication tool that's used in written or spoken text in order to affect the reader or listener in an intended manner.
In this case, the rhetorical strategy that Wiesel is using in the passage is pathos. This is the appeal to the emotion of the audience.
Here, Wiesel tried to persuade the audience by evoking certain emotions in order to make them feel the way that he wants them to feel.
It is used to make readers agree to a particular perspective. Therefore, the correct answer is pathos.
Learn more about rhetorical strategy on:
brainly.com/question/6796727
#SPJ1
Complete question:
What rhetorical strategy did Wiesel use in the perils of indifference?
The theme of this excerpt is that a boy is joking around and when the time came to actually cry out wolf, no one listened. " At last a Wolf really did come, and the Boy cried, "Wolf! Wolf!" as loud as he could, but the people were so used to hearing him call that they took no notice of his cries for help." This quote from the story explains how the bots misbehaving got him no where but being ignored.
