1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
11

What was a threat to the American merchant ships in the Mediterranean Sea?

History
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Barbary corsairs led attacks upon American merchant shipping in an attempt to extort ransom for the lives of captured sailors, and ultimately tribute from the United States to avoid further attacks, as they did with the various European states.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Our response to the Lord starts with making a list we need. True or false
Gwar [14]
False I think do go with my answer right away
5 0
4 years ago
Which major problem did the Roman Empire face in the late second and third centuries?
Mazyrski [523]
D.

All of these were problems the Roman Empire was facing in the late second and third centuries.

7 0
3 years ago
What beliefs about government did early English colonist bring to America
slega [8]
They brought with him beliefs mirroring those of the Enlightenment. They believed that government should protect citizens' natural human rights, and listen to their needs. They also believed that if a government failed to protect its people and their rights, then citizens have the right to abolish that government.
Many of the beliefs about government in the colonies were reflected from Enlightenment leaders, such as John Locke.
6 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
What was one requirement of President Lincoln’s plan for Reconstruction?
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

C. All southern states had to abolish the practice of slavery

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What term is used today to mean the colleges that were started for African<br> American students?
    6·1 answer
  • While the roman people remained vigorous and aggressive, their empire flourished. once they began to sink into a sort of physica
    7·1 answer
  • 3. Why do you suppose the Soviets did what they did?
    14·1 answer
  • Find the surface area of the regular hexagonal prism. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the general term for a raw material or natural resource
    11·1 answer
  • What was the Three-Fifths Compromise?<br><br> a,b,c, or d?
    11·2 answers
  • Summarize the role of religion in the founding of various English colonies. Which of the first thirteen colonies were founded mo
    13·1 answer
  • What was protected with the ironclad clauses included in New Mexico's 1910
    12·1 answer
  • Who started the 1st anti slavery society in the us when?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the Arabs in Palestine react to the Partition Plan?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!