Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, it's reasonable.
What you are doing is solving the question by rounding. You come up with an answer. Suppose you loose the decimal somewhere and you get 0.36? Is that reasonable? Do you just write the answer in the provided blank and move on. What now?
You get it wrong?!!
But your estimate should be about 9/3 = 3. Now you look at your calculator with great misgivings, because it made a mistake. Did it or did you? Well ultimately you did, but you have to blame something. So the calculator takes the heat.
Who knows? Maybe the decimal doesn't work. It's stuck or something. In any event you should be aware that there's no way the answer could be 0.36 when you estimate it to be 3.
Answer:
-51
Step-by-step explanation:
PEMDAS suggests you start with parenthesis
10+9•(-3)2-(7)
10-(27)2-(7)
10-54-7
-51
Answer: The correct answer is option B: There are between 15 and 20 green pieces in all 5 packages
Step-by-step explanation: The most important factor has been given which is, "Which statement about the candy pieces in the remaining packages is best supported by this information."
The information given is such that, the first package she opened had 4 green pieces and on this basis we can safely assume that all other packages have 4 green pieces as well. The second package had 3 green pieces and this based on this too we can safely assume that all other packages had 3 green pieces. Hence, all 5 packages can either have a total of 4 x 5 green candies which equals a total of 20 green pieces or, all 5 packages can have a total of 3 x 5 green candies which equals a total of 15 green pieces.
So according to Suzi's experiment, there are between 15 and 20 green pieces in all 5 packages.
V = π r² h
V = π (4)² 8
V = 402.12
Hope this helps :)
p could be 5 and q could be 8 this is just my guess but i think its right
