Answer:
B) negatively correlated.
Explanation:
The case is set, would reflect a negative correlation between wealth and marital satisfaction.
This means that not necessarily the wealth would cause marriages to report higher levels of happiness or satisfaction. This would imply that there is an inverse relationship between two variables - when one variable decreases, the other increases. So to the contrary, it would mean the opposite. Having less money would favor marital satisfaction.
It is so believed that money issues are important variables so, they should be reconsidered. In the case as stated having more money turns into less satisfaction of the pair.
A example that is similar to this as a negative correlation, is the birth of children, and mariage, since the condition creates stress that the new creature poses to the relationship between the pair, that was often better treated.
I believe the answer is: <span>over rights prejudice
</span><span>over rights prejudice refers to the expectation that we imposed toward a certain group of people simply because of their identity rather than their behavior.
Other examples of </span><span>over rights prejudice would be someone who rejects poor people into educational institution because of they fear that the poor students wouldn't be able to follow the curriculum.</span>
The statement is true that the state of Arizona can sue the state of California over Colorado river water to the United States Supreme Court and can hear the case for the first time. In fact there was a case that happened in 1982 and was decided on 1983.
Answer:
A. Workers died or moved to cities
Explanation:
It was right on the test
