Answer: "The primary reason the U.S. expanded its influence in foreign countries: Economic reasons – industrialization in the late 1800s increased the need to trade with other countries. Sales of American goods to foreign countries were important to the workers in the U.S."
Explanation: "One of the main reasons was for personal economic gain. Many Americans believed that if they could not succeed where they were, they could always move West and start over. After all, that was how the nation had grown so large. The Panic of 1837 was an incentive for many, but the migration had begun before then."
The answer is a superordinate goal. This is something that is sufficiently enormous and sufficiently convincing to help people and gatherings disregard individual contrasts keeping in mind the end goal to accomplish something altogether past their present achieve, something that can't be secretly held by any of the individuals, and is rather nearer in nature to a Commons.
Answer:
c. the war powers resolution of 1973, which aimed to give congress more say in whether us troops were deployed abroad
Explanation:
Arthur Schlesinger, The Imperial Presidency, 1973 was a criticism of the constitution not working as it should, where he believed that the executive branch has too much power in implementing various degree of policy such as foreign policy. Under the Imperilled Presidency he is of the opinion that Congress should be more effective in it oversight as clearly stated in the constitution.
Arthur Schlesinger would most likely support the War Powers Resolution of 1973 which was designed to limit the U.S. president's ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad restricting.
Answer:
i think its false. a conclusion is just a short summary that you use as an ending statement.
Answer: the correct answer is (c) a fallacious argument masquerading as valid.
Explanation:
Fallacious Argument.- An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid. It is crucial to remember that reasoning from definitions and facts to conclusions is fundamentally different from reasoning about definitions.
