They came to America expecting to immediately find gold so a lot of people ended up being ill prepared due to mining once they disembarked as opposed to setting up any real shelter at least some of the English settlers did, I am not so sure about other nationalities settlers
No, because the Bill of rights was like a calming term for Congress for the Federalists
The support of West Berlin was part of the political approach that the US had estaliblished at the moment:<u> the policy of containment against communism</u><u>. </u>
After the Postdam Conference, Germany was divided in four occupation zones, the three Western ones were under the control of the Western allied powers and were unified under the name of Federal Republic of Germany, while the Eastern ones pertained to the URSS and constituted the German Democratic Republic. Berlin was embodied within this fourth Eastern zone, although the city itself was divided in four zones exactly in the same way as the whole country. Therefore, West Berlin was a small area under the influence of the western Allied powers (US, UK and France) embodied in URSS territory.
When the US directly declared their absolute support to West Berlin, it was a clear proof of the contaiment policy that aimed to block the spread of communism and of the confrontation attitude that characterized the whole second half of the 20th century that constituted the Cold War era.
Answer:
Among the several Enlightenment-era influential philosophers, I believe that <u>John Locke</u> is the one who better understood politics, and has the best conception of man's natural state. Plus, he was influential in the US political thought during the Revolution Era.
Explanation:
<u>John Locke theorized that the man, once living in the natural state, it's free, but he doesn't feel himself safe. Then, the man makes a contract with a superior authority - the State - to promote him the necessary goods. However, this contract address that the State shouldn't interfere on the man's business. It's only duty was to promote social development. Once the government didn't follow the contract, man could take off the governor and elect another one. This principle was crucial in the development of the US political thought. </u>If we compare Locke with Jean-Jacques Rousseau, for instance, we can see that Locke has a better conception about politics, and in several ways, Locke's view is more realistic. Rousseau had a romanticized point of view about society, and according to him, humans are strictly good, and they enjoy to live in the community.
