Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
I think the correct answer should be the Letter A.
Answer:
The allusion to Midas reveals the differences in ages between the speaker and the chaperon. This allusion is higlighted in the explanation
Explanation:
And as those aged crickets chirp,
I watch my chaperon's face,
And see the<u> dear old features take
</u>
A<em> new and tender grace</em>;
And in her happy eyes I see
<u>Her youth awakening bright,</u>
With all its hope, desire, delight--
Ah, me! <u>I wish that I were quite
</u>
<u>As young--as young as she! </u>
I think the answer is Special Power of Attorney, it is an authority given to another person of the accountable person (principal) to act on behalf his absence for a transaction. At times this happens when a someone gets too busy of attending to every task.
