Answer:
there different because we all don"t speak the same and every country has there different languages
According to the reports present in the article, we can conclude that the Dust Bowl was a frightening phenomenon, of great proportions and of enormous consequences both in the economy, in the social factors of those who already faced the problems caused by the great depression and still had to face the problems of this phenomenon.
According to the reading of the article, we can see that people are very affected economically, but we can say that these people suffered a lot from psychological problems, since they did not know what they could expect from tomorrow, they did not know if they would pay their debts, if they would have food on their tables and if they would have a favorable and favorable climate for their activities. If I were to stalk in their place, it is likely that I would suffer the same problems, but I would struggle to overcome them and face them in the best possible way, so I could also be a survivor and tell my story, as they told theirs.
Explanation:
Alchemy was the name given in Latin Europe in the 12th century to an aspect of thought that corresponds to astrology, which is apparently an older tradition. Both represent attempts to discover the relationship of man to the cosmos and to exploit that relationship to his benefit. The first of these objectives may be called scientific, the second technological. Astrology is concerned with man’s relationship to “the stars” (including the members of the solar system); alchemy, with terrestrial nature. But the distinction is far from absolute, since both are interested in the influence of the stars on terrestrial events. Moreover, both have always been pursued in the belief that the processes human beings witness in heaven and on earth manifest the will of the Creator and, if correctly understood, will yield the key to the Creator’s intentions.
Nature And Significance
That both astrology and alchemy may be regarded as fundamental aspects of thought is indicated by their apparent universality. It is notable, however, that the evidence is not equally substantial in all times and places. Evidence from ancient Middle America (Aztecs, Mayans) is still almost nonexistent; evidence from India is tenuous and from ancient China, Greece, and Islamic lands is only relatively more plentiful. A single manuscript of some 80,000 words is the principal source for the history of Greek alchemy. Chinese alchemy is largely recorded in about 100 “books” that are part of the Taoist canon. Neither Indian nor Islamic alchemy has ever been collected, and scholars are thus dependent for their knowledge of the subject on occasional allusions in works of natural philosophy and medicine, plus a few specifically alchemical works.
Nor is it really clear what alchemy was (or is). The word is a European one, derived from Arabic, but the origin of the root word, chem, is uncertain. Words similar to it have been found in most ancient languages, with different meanings, but conceivably somehow related to alchemy. In fact, the Greeks, Chinese, and Indians usually referred to what Westerners call alchemy as “The Art,” or by terms denoting change or transmutation.
I’m confused on what you’re asking but true?
Ya sure...
Have a beautiful and joyful day ahead.
