How did truman and eisenhower differ in their approach to the Soviet Union?

1 answer:

4 0

Truman was the one who adopted a policy of containment. This (arguably) aggressive approach was what influenced America to get into wars such as the Korean War and other smaller conflicts. Meanwhile, Eisenhower was a bit less aggressive. Although his Secretary of State Dulles preached Brinksmanship and was very anti-Soviet, Eisenhower himself was somewhat against this, as shown when he did nothing to prevent the Hungarian Revolt. He also sought to increase U.S-Soviet Relations in the Spirit of Geneva, but the U-2 Incident pretty much erased most of his progress.

You might be interested in

British colonialism guided by mercantilism. under this system , what was the purpose of colonies ?

GalinKa [24]

Colonies one purpose was to support the mother country by acquiring raw materials and buying the finished product from the mother country

6 0

3 years ago

Why might deliberating checks and balances be important in a democracy? And why are check and balances important in a democracy?

Korvikt [17]

Answer:Importance of checks and balances in democracy

Separation and sharing of powers among the three branches, through checks and balances, is the basic constitutional means for achieving limited government and thereby protecting the people from governmental abuses. ... Under the system of checks and balances, no branch of the government can accumulate too much power.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

PLZ HELP

Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:The answer is He had been successful in the west.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which ethnic group emigrated due to famine in their home country?

lisabon 2012 [21]

Ireland, due to the potato famine.

6 0

4 years ago

The treaty of Versailles included a “war guilt” clause that

Bad White [126]

Answer:

The Treaty of Versailles is one of the most controversial armistice treaties in history. The treaty's so-called “war guilt” clause forced Germany and other Central Powers to take all the blame for World War I. This meant a loss of territories, reduction in military forces, and reparation payments to Allied powers.

8 0

2 years ago