According to sources, the most probable answer to this query is that Russia belongs to the pro-socialist communist form of government. Hence, it is evident to claim that these type of government will affect future political policies that revolve around this perspective We appreciate your questions. Please, never hesitate to ask more in Brainly your queries.
Answer:
The Song dynasty was the second great "medieval" period of China. But unlike the Tang, it coexisted uneasily with powerful rivals to the north. These rivals were the Khitan Tartars of Manchuria and Mongolia, kept at bay only through costly bribes, and the Jurchen people of Central Asia, who were intent on conquering China but could not be influenced by payoffs. While the Song dynasty managed to recapture—and develop—much of the glory of the Tang, it did suffer a blow in 1127 when the Jurchen took the capital of Kaifeng, and sent the Song Chinese administration southward, to establish the Southern Song capital at Hangzhou, near modern Shanghai. Still the Northern Song (while it lasted) and the Southern Song (from 1127 until 1279) achieved incredible feats of learning, science, art, and philosophy. To the Chinese, the Song was a period certainly as great as the Tang.
I really hope this helps
The statement "Kersaint owned plantations and other property in the French Caribbean"does not called for an immediate abolition of slavery.
<h3>Who is
Armand-Guy Kersaint?</h3>
He was a sailor and politician who held an important naval posts during the early stages of the French Revolution.
Hence, the true statements about Armand-Guy Kersaint during the Napoleon French includes:
- he advocates for encouraging the willing migration of Africans to French colonies rather than their enslavement.
- he had participated in military campaigns against the British in the Caribbean and during the American Revolution.
- he called for abolishing the traditional privileges of the French nobility in France and its colonies.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Napoleon French
<em>brainly.com/question/361806</em>
<span>The U. S. Executive Branch, run by President Obama may make treaties with foreign nations.
The State Executive Brand, run by the governor may not make treaties with foreign nations.
The President may order the mint to coin money (paper and metal.)
The Governor may not coin money (paper and metal.)
The Governor may line item veto spending bills in many states.
The President may not line item veto spending bills.
The President may send troops into foreign nations.
The Governor may not send the National Guard into foreign nations.
The President may issue a Presidential Pardon to men & women convicted or accused or might be accused of a Federal crime.
The Governor may issue a Pardon to men & women convicted or accused or might be accused of a Federal crime.
These are some of the differences and similarities.
</span>
