1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
3 years ago
15

Explain how the events of the story would have been different if Gilman had chosen to write in third person, or another characte

r’s first-person point of view.
English
2 answers:
astraxan [27]3 years ago
6 0
The events of the story would have been very different if it were written from the point of view of John or his sister Jane. Another character wouldn’t have been able to describe to the reader the importance of the wallpaper, and its significance would have been lost. The idea of the woman being kept in the room may have influenced the reader to perceive her differently. Without her perspective, she would have been perceived as just a troubled woman. In Gilman’s version, you sympathize with her because you are getting a firsthand account of how she feels in the room. Without her firsthand description of the room and her thoughts, it would be an entirely different story altogether.
Anni [7]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Changing the point of view will cause completely different narrative of a story. You will never know the character's own thoughts, motifs of doing something and his/her perception of everything will not be that clear as it can be depicted in first point of view, when character tell you his story personally. If it was narrated in first person from other character you would never found out what is really true in the story.<span>
</span></span>
You might be interested in
#1-10 Complete Predicates
Juli2301 [7.4K]
We will continue to fight for justice.
Some commercials are really horrible.
The closest place to get a soda is store on the corner.
The woman next door is really noisy.
There is only one way to study the bible.
Can you help me pick up these guitars.
Go get the bicycle off the porch.
I showed up late to the family reunion.
I really want to join a band.
I want to take the best route to Walmart.
               HOPE THIS HELPED IF SO BRAINLIEST ANSWER PLZZ

4 0
4 years ago
Do you think it was necessary for Buck to kill Spitz? What might have happened had Spitz survived?
Solnce55 [7]
1) It was quite necessary not only for Buck, but also for others struggling to survive in the wild North. If he hadn't killed Spitz it it could have been very dangerous for others because he was very aggressive due to the hunger. Even though he was the leader, blinded by hunger he could do anything to survive, forgetting about the rest of dogs.

2) If he hadn't died he could have get many other innocent lives, like he had done to Curley. This character yielded to the external conflict of the harsh wild conditions, and his instings were much more powerful than his sense of justice so he could have bring harm until he reached his own safety.
7 0
4 years ago
How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? by rephrasing it as a conclusion by adding a statistic or a quotatio
Nimfa-mama [501]

A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.

<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>

Correct answer is option A.

  • By rephrasing it as a conclusion.

  • This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.

  • The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.

Therefore, correct answer is option A.

For more information about  rebuttal, refer the following link:

brainly.com/question/3959097

6 0
3 years ago
Which sentences in this excerpt from Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens reflect the author's satirical tone? "Goodness gracious! Is
zloy xaker [14]
<span>"Lor, only think," said Mrs. Mann, running out,—for the three boys had been removed by this time,—"only think of that! That I should have forgotten that the gate was bolted on the inside, on account of them dear children! Walk in sir; walk in, pray, Mr. Bumble, do, sir. "  This is satirical in the sense that Mrs, Mann called to Mr Bumble to come in, but the gate was locked.  In a way that we as readers could assume that Mrs. Mann wasn't keen in letting Mr. Bumble in. and she curtsied when she opened the gate.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Look the phto<br> help me
VARVARA [1.3K]
4 = can
5 = will be able
6 = was able
7 = can
8 = can
9 = can
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do conjugated verbs agree with their subjects
    14·1 answer
  • What is the central idea of the passage?
    12·2 answers
  • Read the paragraph.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following best illustrates active listening?
    10·2 answers
  • Please help anyone!!!
    15·2 answers
  • Explain the symbolism of the quilt in everyday use
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Why was the boss upset with George and Lennie in the morning?
    10·1 answer
  • Water can be a solid ice a liquid or a gas called
    8·2 answers
  • How does the phrase "florid designs, swoops, and scrolls" affect<br> the tone of the passage?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these lines provides exposition for a story?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!