Two pros: Students leaving school for lunch provides them with greater access to better lunch that they like and more options.
Students leaving school for lunch would be the one opportunity they are given to have freedom apart from the school for 30 minutes to an hour.
In summary of the pros Students should be able to leave school for lunch so they can choose the lunch that is best for their interest instead of having to make a forced decision for school lunch. Also students will return to school more optimistic and interested in learning.
Two cons: Many students may not return to school after lunch or may abuse their lunch time.
Leaving school for lunch will not work out because students will all need transportation and the permission or cooperation of parents (which many will not care much about their child eating school lunch)
In summary of the cons arguments students should not leave school for lunch because their would be too many factors to consider and that would decrease time that should be focused on learning during school hours.
please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
Answer: Because Armand cannot afford new shoes and flowers for Sally, he feels he cannot attend the dance.
Explanation: President Grover Cleveland was condemned and blamed for the depression. Gold resources deposited in the U.S. Treasury declined to a desperately low level. This required President Cleveland to acquire $65 million in gold from Wall Street finance J.P. Morgan and the Rothschild brokerage family of England.
No all the cities do not produce the same amount of light.
Answer:
Character vs. Character
Explanation:
Utterson and Jekyll are more or less fighting; you can see this by the description of how they speak to each other.
You need to post the evidence examples...
