This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read:
A Mom Sues Nutella Maker For Deceptive Advertising
By Whitney Blair Wyckoff
Which statement is not Whitney Blair Wycoff's point of view about suing
Nutella in her article?
O A) Nutella is not a nutritional substitute.
B) We want to hold foodmakers accountable.
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
O D) How could a mom mistake Nutella for health food?
Answer:
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
Explanation:
Wyckoff´s remark about how something that tastes so good could be healthy is only a rhetorical question aimed to emphasize how ridiculous it was for her to believe that Nutella was a healthy snack, not her point of view on the topic.
She does claim that Nutella is not a nutritional substitute, and she does mention the objective of holding food makers accountable which can be understood as a kind of support for that idea. And she also questions Athena Hohenberg for mistaking Nutella for healthy food.
Answer:
By learning how to read and write
Explanation:
One way that Frederick Douglass dismantles his master’s house was through learning how to read and write. Even though this is an expression and he did not physically dismantle his master’s house, Frederick Douglass “dismantled” it because since he knew how to read and write, he had new ideas and was more aware of what was happening around the world. He found out what he can actually do with that new ability and he tried to break free from his master’s control and captivity. He used learning to read and write to his advantage. He read so many books and learned many new things, and he even shared it to his fellow slaves that could not read or write so they could be aware of what Fredrick Douglass learned and that brought up new ideas. Since they had new ideas that have been learned from learning how to read and write, they started in a way rebelling more and questioning why they were like that while in other parts people were not like this. In the future that caused a couple fights and rebellion and they ended up “dismantling the master’s house” because they ended up getting their freedom and they were not in captivity anymore.
It often reflects that it's not yours but someone else's
The following observations can be made about Landscape with the Fall of Icarus:
A. The man with a horse is a noticeable figure.
C. The sun reflects on the water in the distance.
E. The scene shows different elements of nature.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
-
Landscape with the Fall of Icarus is a canvas oil painting by "Pieter Bruegel the Elder" that depicts the legs of Icarus splashing into the water as its wings collapse.
- Icarus is often used as a metaphor for human pride and ambition. This exhibits the humanity, the season, the farmer and nature. Silently the author questions human nature and their self interest.
-
The poem sets out a rising theme of irresponsibility and individualism between mankind. Nowadays no one has time to consider about and stress about the concerns of others.
- The Fall of Icarus is humanity's downfall. This also shows weakening human ideals and human nature. Icarus interacted fairly with both nature and humans. The farmer had been able to support Icarus and keep him alive. Likewise, Icarus showed little loyalty to both the sun and the sea.
The question, or what you have to search for cutie
