Answer:
When using logic to reach your reader/audience, you are trying to get them to think - use their brain. Not their feelings, or what their opinion may be. You want to use empirical evidence or facts to state what you know. The answer choice I would choose would be answer would be A. A logically tells me that there is more out there and that the ocean floor in all has not been mapped.
Explanation:
B - this is an opinion due to the words, "it feels"
C - lends an air of mystery - still based on what I think it might look like
D - using the word clearly seems to me that they are trying to just convince you of a fact not true evidence.
Only A give the logical answer that we all <em>know</em> that all of the ocean floors have not been mapped.
Answer:
Fear has been a friend of mine. Not participating in certain activities because I was simply afraid of them or the outcome that could come with it. I do not enjoy a constant hover of fear but although it is annoying, it has saved me from myself and others.
Explanation:
I think it was self explanatory but I also didn't 100% understand what I was answering. It looks like you're asking for some things to use in an article? But I'm not so sure.
Answer:
B). Comparative negligence.
Explanation:
'Comparative Negligence' is demonstrated as the legal doctrine in which an individual's compensation for an accident or injury is commensurable or proportionate to his/her percentage or degree of responsibility/liability.
in the given example, Susan would most probably employ 'comparative intelligence' to defend herself as damage caused by the dog to shoes and other valuable items was not only due to owner's negligence(but the neighbors/plaintiff too). <u>Thus, this would help Susan to proportionately reduce the amount of the recovery received by the plaintiffs as they too were contributory to the negligence that resulted in damage. </u>Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Calpurnia responds to scout and says her people isn't accepting for whites.
Im so stress:( lol z xhdjs