The question is incomplete. The complete question is
Making college more affordable: the importance of pre-collegiate preparation
PART A: Which statement identifies the central idea of the text?
A. College becomes more accessible and affordable for students when they are better educated and prepared beforehand.
B. Students need to be eased into the transition from high school to college with
additional classes and faculty support.
C. The requirements for universities have become more severe, dissuading many capable students form pursuing a post secondary education.
D. Many students miss out on applying or attending universities after high school
because they are not educated on how to properly apply.
Option (A) is correct
College becomes more accessible and affordable for students when they are better educated and prepared beforehand.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The growth and progress of a nation depend upon its highly educated students. But education should not merely be restricted to higher means. Everyone must have the right to education. But for that, it is important to make the colleges more affordable.
They should be given education beforehand and should be prepared for it so that they get an opportunity to get an admission in a college. Pre-collegiate preparation enables the students to prepare effectively for their college.
Answer: B
Explanation: I just took it
Hmm, I would probably go with B. While both I think are correct, B makes a little more sense.
Pathos came from the Greek word which means suffering. So this means it is a rhetorical device that appeals to the emotion of the audience and elicit feelings that are already inside of them. It could be through the use of metaphor or with the way it is delivered.
Answer:
false
It is very common to compare Socrates with Jesus Christ insofar as they both act as "founding fathers" of Western culture. For two thousand years, each generation has built its own image of Socrates and Jesus; and Christianity has tended to see in Socrates a kind of cultural ancestor, who embodies the figure of the unjustly persecuted good man.
Traditionally they have been considered two martyrs of thought and miles of people in all times have been inspired by their moral example. Comparing is, however, a complex exercise because the Jewish world of the first century before our era had nothing to do with the world of the fifth century in which Socrates lived: the Greek cultural context was polytheistic and the Hebrew was monotheistic.
In Athens, and in classical Greek culture, there is no concept of "sin", which does exist in the Jewish world. Evil and guilt were not linked in Greece in the way they were in the Jewish tradition. Israel were also militarily occupied by the Romans, and although Athens did not live in its time of greatest expansion, in the time of Socrates It was a city that was hardly free and rich - or at least we could easily remember its time of splendor. Nor did the religious instances lose in Athens the power that the Temple of Jerusalem had at the time of Jesus.
In outline, and although we identify what to clarify, we can present a series of similarities and differences between Socrates and Jesus
