Answer:
The comparison between Portuguese and Dutch trade in Asia is done below
Explanation:
Dutch
- Monopoly of spice trade
- possessed trading post empires
- Later practiced colonial form of domination instead of trading post empires
- Attention geared towards Indonesia
- Attempt to control the shipping business
Portuguese
- Unrest in trade due to less value placed on European trade goods
- Raiding of ships and getting away it in order to circumvent monopolistic behaviors
- The Muslims who were monopolistic in spice trade thru setting up of post empires and seizing it force.
Answer:
Historian Eric Foner believed "the policy proved to be a disaster, leading to the loss of much tribal land and the erosion of Indian cultural traditions." The law often placed Indians on desert land unsuitable for agriculture, and it also failed to account for Indians who could not afford the cost of farming. In addition to scant payment, Native Americans were not used to spending money and quickly spent most of what they received. Many were left with little land and little money. Inheritance also became an issue for many Native Americans who enrolled to receive land from the Dawes Act. The assimilation policy of the Dawes Act failed because it didn't take into account the social and cultural differences between the Native Americans and the white settlers. Many others like the Kiowas didn't want to assimilate into white culture and as such resisted.
Explanation:
A is the answer explantion
i think its -4.8 im not so entierly sure tho
