committee membership contribute to the incumbency advantage as assignments from such membership can be used to legislate issues that are really important to their state or districts. By legislating issues critical to the constituency, the incumbent is likely to appeal to voters hence high probability of reelection
Louis XVI was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.
<h3>Who was Louis XVI?</h3>
He was the last King of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution and was called the Citizen Louis Capet during the four months just before he was executed by guillotine.
The limited power at the local level meant that he was unable to influenced the officials at the local level of each corners to the French Kingdom.
However, he was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Louis XVI
brainly.com/question/13565199
#SPJ1
Answer:
in the Yellow and Yangtze River valleys
Explanation:
The civilization of ancient China first developed in the Yellow River region of northern China. A large part of this area is covered by loess soil.
All three worships it's god....hopefully i helped if i got best answer plzz give brainliest
Depends on when you are talking about. This sounds like a Biblical Question so I'll answer it that way.
Very surprisingly, during David's time the population wasn't much more than a couple of thousand according to archaeologists. The area covered was no more than 40 acres even during Solomon's time when Jerusalem was a very important city. It may have had a larger population than in David's time, but the size was not much different.
Forty acres was not much. To give you an idea just how big that might be, consider that a section of land is 1 square mile. 1 section = 640 acres.
40 acres is 1/16 of a square mile. That's like 5 city blocks in any direction and that might be overestimating in. Imagine that? I was very surprised to read that. The temple was massive when you read about it and so were the stables for the horses.
Anyway, if I find out any differently, I'll post in comments. These are secular accounts and not Biblical ones, but I don't hear anyone seriously disputing this.