A right rectangular pyramid when sliced vertically, the  shape of the cross-section is known as Triangle.
<h3>What is A triangle?</h3>
This is known to be a kind of shape that is said to be in  a closed form and it is also known to be a 2-dimensional shape that has 3 sides, 3 angles, and also 3 vertices. 
Note that when the when the right rectangular pyramid is sliced vertically (down) by a plane passing through the  of the pyramid, the new shape of the cross-section is a triangle.
See full question below
A right rectangular pyramid is sliced vertically (down) by a plane passing through the  of the pyramid. What is the shape of the cross-section?
A. Rectangle
B. Pyramid
C. Triangle
D. Trapezoid
See full question below
Learn more about triangle from
brainly.com/question/17335144
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
D. Open the compass so that the distance from the two points of the compass is wider than half the length of 
.
Step-by-step explanation:
To construct a perpendicular for 
, we must first take a compass & take the distance of its arms wider than half the length of 
.
This is done in order to get two intersecting arcs in the top & bottom of 
 so that a perpendicular bisector can be drawn through it.
After two intersecting lines are drawn below & above 
, draw a line joining these 2 points through their points of intersection. The point where it intersects 
 is the middle-most point of 
 & now a perpendicular bisector of 
 is constructed.

 
        
             
        
        
        
The domain of a function f(x) is the set of all values for which the function is defined, and the range of the function is the set of all values that f takes. A rational function is a function of the form f(x)=p(x)q(x) , where p(x) and q(x) are polynomials and q(x)≠0 .
        
             
        
        
        
I'm assuming you're talking about the indefinite integral

and that your question is whether the substitution 

 would work. Well, let's check it out:



which essentially brings us to back to where we started. (The substitution only served to remove the scale factor in the exponent.)
What if we tried 

 next? Then 

, giving

Next you may be tempted to try to integrate this by parts, but that will get you nowhere.
So how to deal with this integral? The answer lies in what's called the "error function" defined as

By the fundamental theorem of calculus, taking the derivative of both sides yields

and so the antiderivative would be

The takeaway here is that a new function (i.e. not some combination of simpler functions like regular exponential, logarithmic, periodic, or polynomial functions) is needed to capture the antiderivative.