With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer:
1. Jefferson supported bimetallism (ethos appeal)
2. It benefited small town farmers who took out loans to pay for their homes and farms.
3. Money is relative. If we say something has value, it does. Gold is only seen as valuable because it always has.
4. International Bimetallism is already practiced.
Explanation:
This powerful speech secured Bryan's seat as a presidential candidate and an advocate for the Populist's party in the upcoming election. He uses rhetoric to push beyond people's tradition and embrace bimetallism in this speech, something which was later achieved.
Answer:
He traveled to Spain and negotiated a settlement that gave Latin America countries independence.
Explanation:
The United States tried to overthrow communist leader Fidel Castro in Cuba.
