All categories

3 years ago

What MOST LIKELY would have happened in the absence of the Monroe Doctrine in "America's

English

1 answer:

Varvara68 [4.7K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: America would have remained isolationist

Explanation:

The Monroe Doctrine was simply a policy in the United States policy whereby European colonialism Wass opposed.

The most likely thing that would have happened in the absence of the Monroe Doctrine would be that America would have remained isolationist. This is because the Europeans would have had control over the country's goods and services.

You might be interested in

We___ to the radio when father comes home. (Listen) into future tense.

Bumek [7]

Answer:

We are listening to the radio when father comes home.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Levi Cannon says, “I think it’s awful that nowadays we don’t talk about politics at Thanksgiving.” What is he comparing in this

luda_lava [24]

Answer:

Levi Cannon the 16-year-old director of operations at Bridge the Divide was comparing politics to other issues such as family matters, which often is discussed during Thanksgiving get-togethers.

This is because many people view political discourses as highly divisive often leading to tense arguments.

In the article, it was suggested that it is possible to disagree on the point of view and still work together to achieve the greater good.

Cheers!

8 0

4 years ago

When will Lena tell HIM the truth?

Galina-37 [17]

When there are two objects in a sentence, the rule is that the first one is going to be indirect, and the second one direct.
Having this in mind, the pronoun HIM is used as B. indirect object, whereas the noun TRUTH is used as direct object.

3 0

3 years ago

11. What is mercantilism?

seropon [69]

Answer:Nations build up their supply of gold and silver to acquire more wealth and power i guess, but none of those options you listed really scream mercantilism. Mercantilism is a policy that is designed to maximize the exports and minimize the imports for an economy.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

1.There was nobody with my brother when the accident happened. (own) My brother ............. when the accident happened. 2. I r

valina [46]

After reading the sentences, we can tell we are supposed to use the words in parentheses to form phrases that will complete the blank spaces. We can do it in the following manner:

My brother <u>was on his own</u> when the accident happened.
I <u>gave up on reading</u> the book after the first three chapter because it was so boring.
The heat <u>made it impossible fo</u>r me to get on with my work.

This question requires knowledge about collocations.

<h3>What are collocations?</h3>

Collocations are words that are often used together in order to convey meaning. Their joint usage is so common that we say they sound good and natural together.

Let's use number 1 above as an example. We must use the word "own" to fill in the blank. We also know that we should say something implying that the brother was alone.

The best option is to say <u>he was on his own</u> when the accident happened. "To be on one's own" means to be alone, and it is a common phrase (collocation) to use and express such meaning.

Learn more about collocations here:

brainly.com/question/21690740

6 0

3 years ago