1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
3 years ago
14

Freeeeeeeeeee.......

Business
2 answers:
Vika [28.1K]3 years ago
6 0

NExplanation: Subscirbe my ninjas

xxTIMURxx [149]3 years ago
6 0
Have a merry Christmas
You might be interested in
Peroni Corporation sold a parcel of land valued at $300,000. Its basis in the land was $250,000. For the land, Peroni received $
Reptile [31]

Answer:

Correct option is C.

<u>$25,000, $25,000.</u>

Explanation:

Gross profit on sale = (300,000-250,000)/300,000 = 16.67%

Gain recognized in:

Year 1 = 150,000 * 16.67% = 25,000

Year 2 = 150,000 * 16.67% = 25,000

3 0
3 years ago
11. If you want to have a return for your Final Portfolio (that is invested between Optimal Risky portfolio and Risk Free Securi
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

Answer is explained in the explanation section.

Explanation:

Note: First of all, this question is incomplete and lacks necessary data to calculate this question. However, I have found the similar question on the internet with complete data given. Additionally, I have shared that data as well in the attachment below for your convenience, Thanks.

Solution:

SD = Standard Deviation

Using utility function, E(R) = Rp - 0.005 x A x SD^{2} = 1.34 - 0.005 x 3x 4.06^{2}

Using utility function, E(R) = 1.093%

If the weight in the risky portfolio is let's say, "a" then,

weight in the risk-free asset = 1 - a

So,

E(R) = a x Rp + (1 - a) x Rf

1.093% = a x 1.34% + (1 - a) x 0.50%

Solving for "a"

a = 70.56% - weight in risky portfolio

and 1 - a = 29.44% - weight in risk-free asset.

Similarly, if you want a return of 1.10%,

we can follow the above steps and get

1.1% = a x 1.34% + (1 - a) x 0.5%

Weight in risky portfolio,

a = 71.43%

weight in risk-free asset,

1 - a = 28.57%

5 0
3 years ago
Determine if the research is deductive or inductive: - If because of analysis of data collected, one infers that the problem of
postnew [5]

Answer:

1. Deductive

2. Inductive

3. Deductive

Explanation:

Deductive research is a form of reasoning that stems from existing theories that can be tested. Data is collected to test a theory and the results are analyzed. The first and third scenarios are deductive research works because there are existing theories or data that can be worked on. In the first instance, data on issues of turnover already exist. In the third scenario, there were theories to explain gender differences.

Inductive research proposes a theory after observation. This is applicable in the second instance where the manager proposes the theory that relates distance to absenteeism after close observation.

5 0
3 years ago
"Which of the following is correct?
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer: Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

The nominal GDP is equal to the real GDP in the base year, that's why GDP deflator in the base year is equal to 100.

GDP deflator is calculated as the nominal GDP divided by the real GDP multiply by 100. It is shown as:

GDP deflator = \frac{Nominal\ GDP}{Real\ GDP} \times 100

GDP deflator would be used as the conversion factor that transformed the real GDP into nominal GDP.

5 0
3 years ago
EuroRail and Swiss Rail are hypothetical railways that have a duopoly on the route that connects the cities of Zurich and Munich
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.

  • Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.

Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?

  • A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).

Explanation:

we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:

                                                  Swiss Rails

                                     add train             do not add train

                                    $1,500 /             $2,000 /

           add train                     $4,000                $7,500

EuroRail

      do not add train    $4,000 /             $3,000 /

                                               $2,000                $3,000

Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.

EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.

A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lois wants to start an art gallery. However, because of lack of adequate funds, she decides to borrow money from a bank. The ban
    12·1 answer
  • The great disparity in economic prosperity between north and south korea can best be explained by the​ _____________.
    8·1 answer
  • Joe Hall owns a limousine for use in his personal service business of transporting passengers to airports. The limousine’s adjus
    10·1 answer
  • Tache Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The first processing department, the Welding D
    13·1 answer
  • Emerald Energy is an oil exploration and production company that trades on the London stock market.Assume that when purchased by
    9·1 answer
  • Kiosks and carts are ideal locations for
    13·2 answers
  • Anita and Roger, two senior members of Bloncert Inc., and Wilma, their subordinate, are having a discussion about the company's
    8·1 answer
  • True or false: a firm with a capital structure containing 70% retained earnings has a marginal cost of capital of $50,000. This
    5·1 answer
  • On January 2, 2020, Howdy Doody Corporation purchased 17% of Ranger Corporation's common stock for $53,000. Ranger's net income
    13·1 answer
  • What was the growth rate of per capita income in india on the eve of independence.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!