The dialogue revealed that "Huck believes that many people cannot be totally trusted" I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead! Feel free to ask more questions.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
The answer would be C. The committee's bickering was seriously impeding any real progress.
impede would translate to preventing...such as preventing progress.
Answer:
(in order)
1. The authors viewpoint
2. The authors purpose
3 the tone
4 Details that support the main idea
5. the audience for the text ( not 100% sure abt this one but it make the most sense based on my knowledge and research,)
Explanation:
