Answer:
"If the Inca king could not conquer the Titicaca lords who owned these vast herds, he could never be safe."
Explanation:
This question is about the article "Lofty Ambitions of the Inca" where the authors explore the history of the Incas, the region they dominated, the people they conquered and the activities they carried out. One of the sections of the article features the title "The Colla Are Kicked Out" where it shows that the Collas were the dominators of Titicaca, which was a land full of riches and with large herds of islands and alpacas that are extremely strong animals and that can be used in several ways. The titicaca gave the Collas a lot of power and that undermined the security and influence of the Incas, which caused King Inca to decide to dominate the Titicaca. We can see this in the article through the line:
"If the Inca king could not conquer the Titicaca lords who owned these vast herds, he could never be safe."
I believe D) to make a connection between his identity and the history and culture of the Kiowa people
Explanation:
the nullification crisis revealed the deep divisions between the North and the South and showed they could cause enormous problems―and eventually, they split the Union and secession followed, with the first state to secede being South Carolina in December 1860, and the die was cast for the Civil War that followed.
Direct characteristic occurs when the narrator directly says what a characteristic is like. Professor shlemiel calls himself “forgetful” and says he’s always blundering and losing thing.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
No you can't use this in today's world, in my opinion, because now a days, it is really hard to get peace with one another countries, as for the middle east, and war gets worst by every 100 years, so that's why i say no, you can't use this 1800's statement in today's world.
