<span>d.ethos; appeals to ethics, logos; appeals to logic, pathos; appeals to emotions
The key thing here is understanding the 6 different words here. They are:
ethos, logos, pathos, emotion, logic, ethics.
You may notice that the 1st 3 words kinda look familiar, but not quite. The reason is that those words are greek and the last 3 words evolved from them. Let's look closer.
ethos looks like it's related to ethics. And that is correct.
logos looks like it's related to logic and that is also correct.
pathos is the root for words such as pathetic, pitiful, etc. Words that evoke an emotional response.
Now with the above in mind, let's look at the options and pick the right one.
a.ethos; appeals to emotion
logos; appeals to logic
pathos; appeals to ethics
* Bad choice. Ethos applies to ethics, not emotion, and visa versa.
b.ethos; appeals to logic
logos; appeals to ethics
pathos; appeals to emotions
* Bad choice. Ethos applies to ethics, not logic.
c.ethos; appeals to pathos
logos; appeals to ethics
pathos; appeals to emotions
* Bad choice. This one is a bit of a mix and match. And having two greek words for the 1st choice? Can it be any more obviously wrong?
d.ethos; appeals to ethics
logos; appeals to logic
pathos; appeals to emotions
* Correct. All of the options match.</span>
Basically the the countries made this system during/after the cold war. The first world is the highly developed countries with high literacy rates and less unemployment (mostly people thing of western countries aka the U.S). The second world is usually known by the Eastern Bloc who were former industrial socialists.
The agreement about the way to represent enslaved people is the Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787. It was stated in the Constitutional Convention that slaves should be counted as three-fifths of a person, the clause intent to balance the power and influence that the counting of slaves in the Southern could have in elections.
The representatives were defined by the number of population and Southern had many slaves and wanted all of them to be counted as voters but they were still treated as property and were not taxed as free people, because the number of slaves was much bigger in southern than northern states, that already abolished slaving, the northern fought back for a fairly counting for the representatives, so they came to an agreement to count three slaves out of every five slaves regarding the population of each state and for taxation matters.
Answer:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties
Explanation:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties, since they had to share a lot of concepts for the constitution's construction. Jefferson for example, adopted some federalist conceptions when he bought some land that he was offered for the benefit of the country. He did so, even though the constitution was not strictly established or allowed for the purchase of land by the president.
On the other hand, at the same time the federalists adopted a strict constructionist position, arguing that the purchase of land by the president was not allowed by the constitution.
Also Madison, who was considered a federalist, acted according to republicans ideas when he refused to sign a congress project that proposed to destinate some money for the construction of roads, he said that idea was against the constitution and he had to reject it.
That is why, at that moment of politics it was hard to distinguish the ideas of the two parties that had been before so strict, but at that moment everything changed.
