He was an advocate for the freedom of religion and educational rights statement is not true.
D) He was an advocate for the freedom of religion and educational rights
<u>Explanation:</u>
Aquinas gave many theories in Philosophy, Theology and Government but he never advocate for the freedom of religion and educational rights. He was known for combining the theories of faith theologically with the theories of reason philosophically.
He also proved the existence of God with his theories. He was focused more on the philosophical aspects and didn't advocate for religion or education rather gave natural law theory defining the good and evil behaviour of humans.
The racial composition of a district could not be the predominant factor when redistricting.
The plan of USSR was:
TO divide Germany to prevent it from waging war again.
Explanation:
The policy of the USSR was to divide Germany into pieces so that it would never wage wars again. Obviously, that was only the surface reasons given by the soviets.
The true reason was rather self serving.
- The part of the East that Russia eventually got was to serve as the buffer for their territory and Europe.
- They had a foothold in mainland Europe.
- The state was Russian in all but name. They had complete control.
These were the reasons that made Russia come to the conclusion it did.
Answer:
It is likely that Rawls claimed that there is no certainty in the statement that you deserve the wealth that you have and that it was acquired through the exploitation of your own talents. This, therefore, is a doubtful statement and must be carefully evaluated.
Explanation:
John Rawls was not in favor of the idea that individuals who use their talents to generate their income are worthy of all their income. That's because For Rawls, the money these individuals get is not, in fact, generated by the talent they have, but by the demand that society imposes on these talents. Therefore, these individuals owe a debt to the society for which they work. This debt must be paid by taxing their income. This taxation will generate the resources that will pay the society that benefits these individuals.
Answer:
The main reason the colonists were angry was because Britain had rejected the idea of 'no taxation without representation'. Almost no colonist wanted to be independent of Britain at that time. Yet all of them valued their rights as British citizens and the idea of local self-rule. They considered the Stamp Act to be the worst in a series of violations of these rights.
Explanation:
