Answer:
helps to keep the country stable even during difficult times, as the economic downturn occurs simultaneously in all sectors and markets. The diversification of business activities brings competitive advantages, allowing companies to reduce business risk. This is why they are such a great business development tools.
The United States courts of appeals (circuit of courts) differ in their purpose from federal district courts in that courts of appeals function as a system to check the performance of federal district court judges.
Federal district courts have the right of working on cases which involve federal laws.
As regards the US courts of appeals, they are forums in which decisions made in federal courts, may be considered again. It doesn't mean that there will be another trial, it means that the courts of appeals may consider any possible mistakes and will be willing to check the performance of the federal cort judges.
Answer:
1. No central government was in authority at the time.
2. There was a huge amount of debt that was owed at the time as well.
3. There was a big shortage of currency too.
4. There was no national army.
Explanation:
Learned it in history class.
<em>If this helped please don't mind marking it brainliest.</em>
History is a social science that studies past social and political events. As a discipline, it uses a methodology in order to study historical facts. Facts are objective for every Historian, but when Historians interpret the same facts often they arrive at different conclusions. That is because interpretation is highly subjective and the only way to interpret facts is through some specific perspective, a point of view or paradigm. When Historians interpret some period of History using a theoretical framework, they look at History like looking through glasses that enhance some factors in detriment of others. And that is inevitable when doing the historical interpretation.
Take, for example, Vladimir Lenin and the rise of the Soviet Union. According to Marxism, it was the forces of a social class, the workers, that rose against the imperial Russian state and the bourgeoisie that led to the creation of a Communist state. There are several historical documents that back this point of view. But according to Intentionalism, it was the powerful and attractive personality of Lenin and his talent for politics which led to the fall of the empire and the establishment of a new political system. Again, this is also very well-documented.
Of course, there can also be many other interpretations for this fact. For any historical event, there are many alternate interpretations, each of which looks at different -and many times contradicting- factors of History.
