Not necessarily their land is not occupied right now but they still terrorize people. But it could have influenced the creation of such groups due to a foreign people with different beliefs and tradition came into their lands.
Yes, it is true that President Jackson opposed the national bank because he felt that it enabled eastern businesspeople to make money at the expense of southern planters and western f<span>armers, since he valued himself as a champion of "common" people. </span>
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
Answer:
what is your question?
If you help me understand what you need I can help you
