True.
Mostly false though.
If an animal wanted to eat a person that died from a mutation they could but I would say that would be a rare occurance.
<u>Answer:</u>
Option (C)
There is no change in mass during a chemical reaction;
<u>Explanation:</u>
The law of mass conservation can better explain this phenomenon. According to the rule, "Energy can not be either produced, nor can it be lost."
In simpler terms, the total masses of all substance involved in a chemical reaction are same. Furthermore, the total atoms on either sides, i.e., reactant side and product side are the b.
Answer:
nucleus is the answer your welcome
He would say that Lamarck's theory is wrong. Lamarck's theory stated that traits that are used are passed on to the offspring. In other words, if an organism changes during its lifetime in order to adapt to its environment, then its changes will be passed on to its offspring. This is wrong because this means that organisms pass on traits based on genetic information and not based on the environment of the offspring.
Hope this helps.
That the pace of everyday life is such that is prevents individuals from perceiving that which the society deemed as unimportant.
