The way in which the rhetorical appeals in the following selection advance the author's purpose is A. Paine argues the price of freedom can be measured and quantified.
This is because he talks about how "Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
<h3>What is a Rhetorical Appeal?</h3>
This refers to the use of persuasion to try and convince a person about a particular viewpoint.
Hence, we can see that the way in which the rhetorical appeals in the following selection advance the author's purpose is A. Paine argues the price of freedom can be measured and quantified.
This is because he talks about how "Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
Read more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
Examples of symbols in the story include roads, which are metaphors for life paths and choices and the symbols provided by the descriptions of nature in the poem which are metaphors for the times in people's lives (specifically when they are making large life choices).
These figurative nature of the roads and the descriptions of the natural world in the setting allow the reader of the poem to infer that the poem is not "actually" about roads in the woods, but about the ways that our choice of life path can affect things.
Answer:
<u>positive -- neutral -- negative</u>
fragrance -- smell -- odor
request -- ask -- demand
slim -- average -- skinny
discuss -- debate -- argue
observe -- watch -- spy
unique -- uncommon -- strange
detect -- find -- snoop
Answer:
Well yes and no
Explanation:
Yes you can transition an idea to another in just one sentence, but if you want to go into brief about a little you can do more than one sentence but I would not recommend more than 2-3sentence of transitions though
C the evidence because that is the most part of an argument which is true and which is facts, nothing about it is false because it is proven and taken out of real life. The evidence backs up the reasons and claim it backs up everything of the whole argument it is what makes the reader want to join the authors side of the argument.
