Answer:
Life in Jamestown in the early 1600's was very hard to survive and consisted of disease, danger and death. They built a basic fort to protect themselves from the indians. Only 38 out of 100 survived. They ate pretty much anything and everything they could find.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h3>Giovanni Da Pian Del Carpini, English John Of Plano Carpini, (born c. 1180, Pian del Carpine?, near Perugia, Umbria—died Aug. 1, 1252, Antivari [Bar], Dalmatia?), Franciscan friar, first noteworthy European traveller in the Mongol Empire, to which he was sent on a formal mission by Pope Innocent IV. He wrote the earliest important Western work on Central Asia.</h3>
<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>
It prevented slaves from learning how to read and write. It also made it scary for them to escape because they allowed slave owners to whip them or hang them for trying to escape or committing small or big crimes.
Palestine is your answer
the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) is created by the Middle Eastern countries to try to annihalate Israel, and set up the nation of Palestine within Israel,
hope this helps
As I understand it, Laissez-faire ideology maintains that the "free market" is the best way to determine what businesses can and should do. This means that businesses, in competition with one another, should be free to determine their paths free from any government rules or regulations. The belief is that the competition among various businesses will ultimately result in the best outcomes for society in general - Adam Smith's "invisible hand". As part of this philosophy, workers should also be free to compete with each other and choose to work wherever they wish and this process will also result in the best results for the workers as well.
However, isn't there a huge assumption in this philosophy? Doesn't the whole justification of this belief depends on the condition that there is perfect competition and that any company and any worker have the equal ability to compete with one another?
What if there is no perfect competition? What if some companies have advantages - due to any of a whole array of reasons - that place them in a non-competitive position vis a vis their competitors? Without perfect competition then other companies are not necessarily able to compete with other companies that have certain advantages. If such a situation exists, then advantaged companies may have the ability to pursue a course that results in their private benefit, but not necessarily to the benefit of society as a whole. The same would apply to workers in that reduced competition among companies would result in decreased leverage for potential employees.
To recap, if the Laissez-faire ideology maintains the best economic policy for society as a whole, and it depends on there being perfect competition on an ongoing basis with minimal government intervention, doesn't it fall apart if there is less than the perfect competition?
