No English monarch could ignore Parliament is the correct answer on edgenuity, just took the test.
<span>A stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as B. a historical argument. This is when you choose what to believe in - history may be interpreted in many ways, and all of them can be either wrong or correct, but it is up to you to choose that analysis which you thing is the right one. That analysis will be called a historical argument, because you will provide others with arguments as to why that interpretation should be correct.</span>
A purple stone traded by ancient merchants in eastern Oklahoma was the obsidian.
In ancient times, pre-Columbian civilizations like the Mayans used obsidian for many purposes, including to make tools and weapons (arrowheads, blades, etc.), as well as ritual and ceremonial objects (for burials for example).
There is believed to have been obsidian trade routes all throughout the American continent, even though obsidian does not itself originate in Oklahoma.
Washington and the Continental Army are the people he offered service to when he came to Philly.
Answer: The declaration of "state of emergency", "martial law" and other extraordinary measures is allowed by the Constitution because The National Emergencies Act is a United States federal law passed to end all previous national emergencies and to formalize the emergency powers of the President. The Act empowers the President to activate special powers during a crisis but imposes certain procedural formalities when invoking such powers.
Explanation:
This proclamation was within the limits of the act that established the United States Shipping Board. The first president to declare a national emergency was President Lincoln, during the American Civil War, when he believed that the United States itself was coming to an end, and presidents asserted the power to declare emergencies without limiting their scope or duration, without citing the relevant statutes, and without congressional oversight. The Supreme Court in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer limited what a president could do in such an emergency, but did not limit the emergency declaration power itself. It was due in part to concern that a declaration of "emergency" for one purpose should not invoke every possible executive emergency power, that Congress in 1976 passed the National Emergencies Act.
