Answer:
State criminal proceedings
Explanation:
Mapp v. Ohio (1961), was a landmark case in criminal procedure, in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures," may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts, as well, as had previously been the law, as in federal criminal law prosecutions in federal courts. The Supreme Court accomplished this by use of a principle known as selective incorporation.
Answer
Probably as disgusting.
Explanation:
The Europeans might think the Aztecs were barbarians because of their ritual and human sacrifices.
If one big majority of the territory favors slavery and "remember territories were not that big" the other small majority does not want slavery it could be outnumbered
Hope I was much help
Answer: taking on many duties of a goverement
Explanation:
The type of learning that Pavlov observed and researched resulted from associating an unconditioned response with a <u>Neutral stimulus</u>.
Pavlov diagnosed an essential associative learning manner known as classical conditioning. Classical conditioning refers to gaining knowledge of what takes place when an impartial stimulus (e.g., a tone) will become related to a stimulus (e.g., meals) that evidently produces a behavior.
A neutral stimulus is a stimulus that initially produces no particular response apart from focusing attention. In classical conditioning, when used collectively with an unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus turns into a conditioned stimulus.
With repeated displays of each the impartial stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus, the impartial stimulus will elicit a response as nicely, referred to as a conditioned reaction. Once the neutral stimulus elicits a conditioned response, the impartial stimulus becomes known as a conditioned stimulus.
Learn more about neutral stimulus here: brainly.com/question/15466647
#SPJ4
