From the given question, we can say that suppression or suspension of the Bill of Rights isn't okay.
Let's look at what the Bill of Rights is all about.
<h3>What is the Bill of Rights?</h3>
As pertaining to the United States, the Bill of Rights is known to be the first ten amendment of the constitution. It's a bill that guarantees the civil rights and liberties to individuals.
In other words, it bestows on the freedom of speech, religion, and press.
If the above is what the Bill of Rights is, then suppressing it is same as suppressing the people.
If the Bill of Rights is suppressed or suspended:
- The federal government will have total power over the people.
- It will weaken the relationship between the government and the people.
- It will expose and endanger the people to rogue politicians.
- The vulnerable people in the society will suffer.
Thus, suppression or suspension of the Bill of Rights isn't okay.
Learn more about Bill of Rights on brainly.com/question/11330436
Answer: The Senate was the most powerful branch of the Roman republic, and senators held the position for life. The executive branch was made up of two consuls, elected yearly. These two consuls had almost kingly powers, and each could veto, or disapprove of the other's decision.
Explanation:
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option D. In British history, "the restoration" refers to <span>the return of the monarchy following Oliver Cromwell's death. This also marks the return of Charles II as the king. Hope this answers your question.</span>
It's the "alleged" genocide of the Armenian people, which Turkey categorically denies to this day.
The Dead Sea is at the end of the med sea and the med sea is very big compared to the Dead Sea.
