One way to demonstrate academic integrity is to give credence and acknowledgement to the sources of your information.
For example:
You wrote a definition of a term. And you found that definition in a book authored by somebody. On you paper, you either write "According to the novel written by author, TERM is defined as..."
For example:
You are tasked to define the word "plagiarism".
To demonstrate academic integrity, you define plagiarism like this:
According to wikipedia, Plagiarism is <span>the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.
Note that you have stated your source.
You can then add your own input and thought about the word. Like this:
I believe that plagiarism is an act of a lazy person. A person who pretends to be smart but in reality is just a parasite.
</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "He understood that Rainsford was an expert hunter, perhaps better than himself." The statement that can be inferred from the general's behavior in the excerpt is that h<span>e understood that Rainsford was an expert hunter, perhaps better than himself.</span>
The answer to this question would be A. True.
Lack of motivation indeed carries a message that is worth heeding. These extremes are all carriers of messages that might be that the one posing as their mother ship can't express what they really want, thus they conform to the wills and demands of other people most likely their parents or friends. Another possibility would be that they want to escape or forget it or even hide it from other people. A lack of motivation tells the observer that the one being observed is most likely doing something which isn't in line with the person's passion.
Comparison/Contrast is the structure used:)
Without adjectives, we could not describe things. Color would be less precious to us: there would be cars, but not red cars or blue cars or black cars. In describing a cat to someone who’s never owned a cat, all you could say is, “A cat is an animal with ears and a tail.” You couldn’t explain its soft fur or sharp claws.
