Answer: All of the above.
Explanation: None of the listed options would be included when calculating the gross domestic product of a country. This is so because gross domestic product only calculates the total value of commodities/services produced by a country during a fixed time frame.
Answer:
Mike's recognized gain from the transfer of the house to him is:
$175,000
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Marital property = $1,500,000
Cost of property = $575,000
Residual value = $925,000
Alimony to Karen = $750,000 ($150,000 * 5)
Balance (Mike's) = $175,000
$175,000 represents the excess of the fair market value of the marital property after deducting the cost of property and the alimony paid to Karen. A gain of $175,000 is recognized by Mike after the property sale.
Answer:
The correct answer is option e
e. Zero to $5,000
Explanation:
<em>Net Present Value (NPV) : This is one of the techniques available to evaluate the feasibility of an investment project. The NPV of a project is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows and the cash outflows of the project discounted at the required rate of return</em>
PV of cash inflows
= $15,600 × (1.15)^(-1) + ( $15,600× 1.15^(-2) + ($28,900 × 1.15^(-3) ($15,200 × 1.15^(-4)
=53,053.92
NPV =53,053.92-48,100
NPV =4,953.927
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Beck was the general manager of company. By signing the company's document, actually company is liable to pay that amount not individual. The claim that Haines make is incorrect as any liability is supposed to be beared by company. The claim that Beck made is correct. because he wrote general manager which means he is an employee of that company. So, liability falls on company rather than individual.
