1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flura [38]
2 years ago
9

4. HISTORY During World War I, it was a crime to criticize the president or the war effort. Would a court today find such a law

as a
constitutionally valid interpretation of the First Amendment? Why or why not?
History
2 answers:
kenny6666 [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

watch me wep watch me neyney ey

Lostsunrise [7]2 years ago
7 0
Back then seditious libel against government officials was really a denied freedom. It’s safe to say nowadays people are welcome to critique the presidents policies and affairs openly. Yes they would find it valid because the structure of the constitution is what we base our legal codes, there are 5 freedoms that come with free speech and the government can’t deny that liberty.
You might be interested in
Which outcome was an important effect of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution?
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

The United States committed its ground troops to South Vietnam

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
The Chinese-Japanese War (also known as the Sino-Japanese War) primarily had to do with _________.
Paha777 [63]
<span>The origin of the conflict between the Qing Empire of China and Empire of Japan was primarily the over the influence of Korea. Thus, the answer to this item is letter A. Korea. This demonstrated the failure of the Qing Empire's attempt to modernize its military forces. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was the only country to prevent significant rebellions or revolts from occur in the early 19th century?
MrRissso [65]
It was question A, England
6 0
2 years ago
It was possible to move up in social class in ancient Egyptian society.
Hitman42 [59]
The answer  to this question is true.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help 20 points!!! The Anti-Federalists argued against ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they
lutik1710 [3]
Believed that states’ rights (powers) were not being protected
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Was it dangerous for those revolting in The American Revolution?? Why?? Please help!!
    7·1 answer
  • How much time passed lincoln’s inauguration and the formation of the confederacy?
    13·2 answers
  • When was Hitler Youth started and by whom?
    12·1 answer
  • Article Five of the U.S. Constitution describes the amendment process. This power best reflects the principle of (3 points)
    9·1 answer
  • How is the structure of Congress different under the articles of confederation and the constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • What led to reform movements in cities
    13·2 answers
  • what happened in the 1920s that greatly lowered the price of car (automobiles) and other consumer products ?​
    14·1 answer
  • Write a composition that discusses the benefit of literature to you as a students
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ME ASAP PLS THANK YOU!
    13·1 answer
  • What if souvenir shops in Philadelphia were willing and able to pay $23 for a box of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!