What is one way Greek civilization affected Roman culture?

History

2 answers:

svetoff [14.1K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

I am not sure but I think A

B is wrong a Roman woman had more rights than a Greek woman

Explanation:

Greek art is considered superior to the "merely" imitative or decorative Roman art; indeed much art we think of as Greek is actually a Roman copy of a Greek original. It is often pointed out that the goal of the classical Greek sculptors was to produce an ideal art form, whereas the goal of Roman artists was to produce realistic portraits, often for decoration. This is an obvious oversimplification

Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:I’m pretty sure it’s d

Explanation:in this photo it says Greek plays were preformed by romans

You might be interested in

In what ways does the culture of Paleolithic people resemble modern human cultures ?

Andrews [41]

Not very many similarities but I'll give it a try. During the Paleolithic era, although they had smaller groups and were largely more nomadic, entire communities would share their efforts often times. Early forms of religion (such as the honoring of the fertility goddess) were worshipped, and sometimes helped shape lifestyles. Artwork in the form of cave paintings and small carvings developed. This seems to demonstrate a human desire to have the ability to express oneself, which is still a common desire nowadays. Social structures were not as strong and strict as they may be in some places now, but there seemed to be a sexual division of labor where men hunted and women gathered and took care of children. Besides this not sure what else to say. Hope that helped

8 0

3 years ago

What are the challenges of empire and what is the usual result?

gulaghasi [49]

It depends. if we're talking about the emperor it self, than i dont know the direct answer. If we're talking about a large scale empire, like the Roman Empire, than first of all, there are multiple religions, cultural groups, a huge area of land to keep safe and guarded, and you have to make sure that your people like your empire, so they wont go nuts and start revolting all around your country. For the roman empire, barbarians were a problem too. The usual result is either 1 of 2.

in the first case, the emperor can govern the country just right and make sure his people wont go nuts for a while, take care of foreign business well, to make sure he's friends with neighbours and have a strong currency, and army, to keep the economy and the country safe. This usually works for sometime, but after a few or lot of years the people will go nuts, because things always change.

in the second case, the empire falls apart slowly and basaically get eaten by other countries who surround them or who got independent after a revolt.

with this im basically saying, there are a lot of problems with medieval or earlier empires, and no matter what the emperor/empress does, it will fall apart somehow.

Hope I gave a somewhat good answer

3 0

3 years ago

Which two areas of the united states were bought from other countries??

antiseptic1488 [7]

OREGON TERRITORY FROM THE BRITISH. LOUSIANA PURCHASE FROM THE FRENCH.

4 0

3 years ago

Fugitives risked being captured in northern states.

AnnyKZ [126]

Answer: 2nd option/ B

Fugitives risked being captured in northern states.

Explanation: I just got it right

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

14.how did the United states entries into the war differ from that of its European allies?

denis23 [38]

Answer:

Explanation:The usa entered the war by direct attack apposed to the european ones entering because of an alliance to protect poland if it were to be invaded by the germans.

7 0

3 years ago