It would be my pleasure to help you out on this answer. Would it be alright if you would take a photo of the text your are going to right about?
Answer:
The best answer to the question: What are the "tatters and charcoal ruins of history? would be: the books and any such written texts, that had by now been prohibited and were considered useless and even hateful. These were the ruins of written history and they were left in tatters because they were always burned.
Explanation:
"Farenheit 451" is the novel that was written by Ray Bradbury and which was published in 1953. The story narrates the life of Guy Montag, a firefighter who has to perform his duty, like everyone else, of exterminating literature and all other kinds of writting, that are present in books. In order to do this, Montag, and his colleagues go to different places where books might be present, and instead of putting out fires, fire them to burn books. In this particular excerpt, which is part of the very opening of the novel, the main character is talking about books themselves, and how they were seen as an evil thing that needed to be destroyed, as they were deemed useless. History, and knowledge, says the novel, was now given through other types of media.
Answer:
A. As the speaker turns from mourning murder victims to accusing their executioner, the poem focuses on the injustice of the dictator's rule.
Explanation:
<u> A. is the right answer. Around line 30 of the poem the shift occurs, the poet talks about the dictator as the murderer and points finger at him as the unjust ruler and tyrant</u>. The author is explaining how it is the dictator’s fault that millions are dead and how he also has “the heart and the skull”, and so does the audience that claps and supports him, but which can become the victim as well.
B. is not the right answer. The poem does not explore the experiences of survivors' feelings of guilt.
C. is not the right answer. The poem does not call people to action against the dictator.
D. is not the right answer. There is no part about securing closure for certain, and the poem ends ambiguously.
Answer:
were all different
Explanation:
this is an answer you can only explain we can't speak for you
