For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
false he did not propose 10%
what He actually had done is proposed a 5 percent tax on imported goods.
Because it gave a lot of territory to the French colony (Quebec), including the current Ohio. Also, it gave a lot of rights to the French population, allowing them to keep their laws and language in public matters.
Your answer is C. The Framers wanted to make sure that when parties rise, they will met the needs of the constitution.
Answer:
Plessy I think was a black whom had been given freedom, but the wife said something, sorry, been a while.
Explanation:
