The USA's National Academy of Science supports the view that science and religion are independent. Science and religion are based on different aspects of human experience. In science, explanations must be based on evidence drawn from examining the natural world.
Yes, I do. Science is only capable of proving or disproving a scientific idea or theory which is an idea or theory that can be proven true and false by testing. Since god is inherintly unscientific, the scientific stance is neutral. You can also look at it as since god dosen't have a scientific definition, theological noncognitivism is the only viable stance. Either way, they cannot conflict because one cannot acknowledge the other.
The <span>name of the proposed law that would ban slavery in all territory won in the Mexican American war was the "Wilmot Proviso"--named after the man who proposed it. </span>
