Answer: Colin's evidence is not relevant to his claim<u> because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.</u>
Explanation: Colin's evidence is not related to his main claim, that is to say the assertion that drones do not invade people's privacy<u>. Instead of focusing on providing evidence that supports the idea that drones do not affect people's privacy negatively, Colin offers evidence related to the thought that flying drones is a sport </u>by stating that coordination and technical skills are necessary to fly drones. Therefore, it can be said that his argument lacks strength because it has not been properly supported.
He believed that if you have wealth and don’t spend it then there’s no point in being wealthy. But if u have wealth and u spend it to make ur self or other happy then there was a point in u being wealthy.
Think of verbs as "action words" done by the subject. The subject in this sentence is "we". What did we do? "We" "heard" and had "seen". So the verbs would be "heard" and "seen"
