1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nookie1986 [14]
3 years ago
14

Compare and Contrast the impact the expansion of the empires of the Spanish, French and English during the 18th Century had on N

ative American women and their families.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Please help me with background info, would GREATLY help me with my response for this exerpt. I am more worried about details to help me formulate my response.

In advance, thank you very much!! :)
History
1 answer:
anastassius [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The mountain men and pioneers of the 19th century to the French fur traders of the 17th and 18th centuries were similar people in the following context.

Explanation: The pioneers were families that wanted to find new opportunities in the western territories. That is why many risked their lives and adventured to cross the Oregon Trail to explore and get some new land. Pioneers wanted to discover new land to settle in and establish a new life with his families. The French Fur traders were European explorers that came to the Americas to explore new land and realized the economic potential of the fur trade. They were not interested in settling in the new territory, but to get rich with the fur trade.

You might be interested in
What does it mean for a country to be a “world leader”? How might a country become a world leader?
dangina [55]

Answer:

THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH AND SET AN EXAMPLE FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES..

THEN THEY WILL BE LIKE A LEADER FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES

FOR QUESTION 2

Roosevelt described his style of foreign policy as "the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis." As practiced by Roosevelt, big stick diplomacy had five components. First it was essential to possess serious military capability that would force the adversary to pay close attention. At the time that meant a world-class navy. Roosevelt never had a large army at his disposal. The other qualities were to act justly toward other nations, never to bluff, to strike only when prepared to strike hard, and the willingness to allow the adversary to save face in defeat.

The idea is negotiating peacefully but also having strength in case things go wrong. Simultaneously threatening with the "big stick", or the military, ties in heavily with the idea of Realpolitik, which implies a pursuit of political power that resembles Machiavellian ideals.It is comparable to gunboat diplomacy, as used in international politics by the powers.

Explanation:

HOPE I HELPED

PLS MARK BRAINLIEST

DESPERATELY TRYING TO LEVEL UP

                    ✌ -ZYLYNN JADE ARDENNE

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an 18th century intellectual movement beginning in France.
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

Enlightenment, French siècle des Lumières (literally “century of the Enlightened”), German Aufklärung, a European intellectual movement of the 17th and 18th centuries in which ideas concerning God, reason, nature, and humanity were synthesized into a worldview that gained wide assent in the West and that instigated.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which 20th century U.S. President is credited with establishing the national forest and park system in order to better manage Am
NNADVOKAT [17]
Theodore Roosevelt is the answer to your question
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one effect of the latin american economic nationalism?
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Thwey ended up having american economic nationlism which ended up in governemtn control; over ppl

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did westward expansion divide Democrats and Whigs?
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

Democrats favored expansion in order to increase their power in Congress and expand slavery; Whigs opposed expansion because they feared losing power in Congress.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best definition of public policy?
    13·2 answers
  • Increasing feelings of nationalism among many groups led to which<br> consequence after World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the relationship between peninsulares and creoles contribute to the fight for independence in Spanish America?
    13·2 answers
  • Pls helppppppp asaplpp
    5·1 answer
  • Around the twelfth century, simple grave markers began to appear as did elaborate effigies. this was as part of increasing empha
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Louisiana Purchase affect sectionalism?
    8·1 answer
  • What kind of culture changes do you think the great migration brought to the African American community
    9·1 answer
  • How might new innovations have enabled European countries to dominate other to countries or regions ?
    5·2 answers
  • Please help me i would really appricate it &lt;3
    15·1 answer
  • We propose an alliance on the following basis with Mexico: That we shall make war together and together make peace. We shall giv
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!