The reaction of President Johnson to the Gulf of Tonkin incident did indeed show a monolithic view of Communism because he believed that Communism was dangerous.
<h3>What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?</h3>
This was an event in 1964 when it was said that North Vietnamese navy boats attacked American naval destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.
The North Vietnamese were Communists and Johnson responded by increasing U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
This shows a rigid view of Communism because Johnson thought that it would be right to go after Communists in Vietnam because all Communists were dangerous.
Find out more on the Gulf of Tonkin incident at brainly.com/question/15593184.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Jean-Paul Marat was seen as a revolutionary and journalist.
Explanation:
He was one of the most revolutionary voices of the French revolution and he was radical within his written works...
basically just distortion
Because map projections must turn a 3-D world into a 2-D map, they will always have the problem of: distortion
Converting maps from 3-D into 2-D will often cause some sort of misshape of the map, even though the distance and the size projection between the maps maybe accurate
Answer:
he won more then what he was supposed to
Answer:
The difference between the Articles of Confederation and Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation are the rules that were agreed by the United States of America in the 18th century whereas the constitution is the rules that democratic countries and other legalized institutions develop to implement law and order in their body.
Explanation:
The difference between the Articles of Confederation and Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation are the rules that were agreed by the United States of America in the 18th century whereas the constitution is the rules that democratic countries and other legalized institutions develop to implement law and order in their body.
