In "Animal Farm," author George Orwell uses Squealer's explanation to support his purpose in the following manner:
A. Squealer's explanation of Napoleon's tactics is representative of a dictator who reverses policies and lies about his reasons.
In the allegorical novella "Animal Farm," the pigs represent the Soviet leaders who controlled Russia after the revolution.
Napoleon is the dictator and Squealer is responsible for speaking to the other animals, convincing them of whatever Napoleon wants.
Napoleon was against building a windmill that would make life easier on the farm for all animals. However, once he realizes he can use the windmill for profit, he changes his mind.
This is when Squealer talks to the animals and lies to them by saying Napoleon always wanted to the windmill to be built. He says the windmill was indeed Napoleon's idea.
What the author is doing here is using the characters to show how dictators lie to people every time they change their minds.
They come up with new reasons and explanations in order to do whatever they want.
With that in mind, we can choose letter A as the best option.
The complete question with the excerpt can be found attached.
Learn more about "Animal Farm" here:
brainly.com/question/13717719
Answer:
C. No faith is strong. Only strong have biceps. No faith has biceps.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the topic of "Syllogism." This is a type of reasoning which consists of a <em>premise or</em><em> </em><em>premises</em> and a <em>conclusion.</em> The conclusion is logically derived from the premises. In order to do this, the two premises have to be joined together.
Among the choices above, letter B<em> shows a conclusion that has been logically derived from the first two premises.</em> Its premises support the conclusion.
<em>"No faith has biceps."</em> is a valid argument because it is supported by a premise <em>("No faith is strong.")</em> and another premise <em>("Only strong have biceps.")</em>.
"Only strong have biceps" also means that "All biceps are strong."
This statement is very important for the movie plot. Walt is tells a war story from the time he fought in Corea. He is also talking about knowing something is risky and doing it anyway. He talks about finishing the things you start. He claims he has blood in his hands and it's better for Thao to keep himself out of what's about to happen. Walt knows he is in great danger and tries to protect Thao. He then confronts the gang and is killed in coldblood in the middle of the street while he pretends to draw a gun from his jacket.
Then you should say something about yourself and your relationship to this subject. Fear, commitment, protection. You could also say something about facing problems with different angles or doing things not the way you are expected to.
I think they are quality of information, leisure to digest it and the right to carry out actions based on what we learn from the interaction of the first two.
