The first step to creating a budget is setting a realistic goal you can achieve. Goals will help you with making smart spending choices.
Precedent means "a decision that can be legally used due to the current situation"
For example, in the US constitution:
1) "The Ratification of the Conventions of 9 states, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the Same"
- It is already ratified, and so we don't really need it
2) "All debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the adoption of this constitution, shall be as valid against the US under this Constitution, as under the Confederation"
-Again, it is already ratified, note that it says "before the adoption"
3) "No person held to Service or Labour in One state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up on claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due".
- We really don't need this anymore, because we don't have slavery
hope this helps
The term Phillip Converse coined about how many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly, is known as "Non-Attitudes."
Phillip Converse was known for being a Political Science Professor at the University of Michigan.
In one of his research which he documented in a book titled "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Public."
He concluded that normal people who are not political elites don't ideologically take policies but rather flow with the prevailing issues.
Therefore he described these people as "non-attitude" because they don't have the attitude of a typical politician.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Phillip Converse defined "non-attitudes" as many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1470181
Answer:
Explanation:
The Third Estate would become a very important early part of the French Revolution. ... But the dramatic inequality in voting—the Third Estate represented more people, but only had the same voting power as the clergy or the nobility—led to the Third Estate demanding more voting power, and as things developed, more rights
Answer:
I think it is OK because the people can choose whether or not to break the rules, they are putting themselves at risk and it's there decision.
Explanation:
