1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovangra [49]
3 years ago
9

Ryan is planning a party for his parents' anniversary. The caterer charges a delivery fee of $14 plus an additional & 5.25 p

er person. If he can spend no more than $350, how many people can he invite?
Can you help me define the variable, set up an equality, and solve it?
Mathematics
2 answers:
Phoenix [80]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

variable(X)- amount of people he can invite

inequality- 350≥14+5.25x

answer- He can invite 63 people

Step-by-step explanation:

350≥14+5.25x

334≥5.25x

63.62≥x

Because you cannot have only part of a person, the most amount of people he can invite is 63.

-BARSIC- [3]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

$14+$5.25=$19.25

$19.25 x 18 = $346.5

You might be interested in
A number cube is rolled 10 times an even number comes up 6 times what is the experimental probability of an even number coming u
icang [17]

Answer:

3/5

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of an even number coming 6 times  out of 10 is 6/10. Simplify to get 3/5

3 0
3 years ago
He donated half money to the food bank. How many does he have?
Alisiya [41]
He has half of the money because 1-1/2 = 1/2
3 0
3 years ago
Last year, a comprehensive report stated that 28% of businesses in the northeast of Ohio were considered highly profitable. This
Alik [6]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.38 -0.28}{\sqrt{\frac{0.28(1-0.28)}{50}}}=1.575  

p_v =2*P(z>1.575)=0.115  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.01 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of businesses were highly profitable is not significantly different from 0.28 or 28%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=50 represent the random sample taken

X=19 represent the businesses were highly profitable

\hat p=\frac{19}{50}=0.38 estimated proportion of businesses were highly profitable

p_o=0.28 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of businesses were highly profitable is different from 0.28 or no, the system of hypothesis is.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.28  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.28  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.38 -0.28}{\sqrt{\frac{0.28(1-0.28)}{50}}}=1.575  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.01. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z>1.575)=0.115  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.01 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of businesses were highly profitable is not significantly different from 0.28 or 28%.

4 0
4 years ago
No cap got a brain fart need help just gotta find x
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

ok did you really just say brain fart I'm dying I cant stop laughing

4 0
3 years ago
A
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer: (7 + d) 4 and 4 (7 + d)

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>4 (d + 7) = 4d + 28</em>

<em />

(7 + d) 4 = 28 + 4d (flipped version of 4d + 28)

4 (7 + d) = 28 + 4d (the same)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Factor the polynomial completely using the X method. x2 + 13x – 48 What is the four-term polynomial and factored form of the pol
    13·2 answers
  • Which algebraic rule describes the 180° counterclockwise rotation about the origin
    10·2 answers
  • A = {1, 2, 3, 4} B = {3, 4, 6, 8} C = {5, 6, 7} A∪B∩C=
    15·2 answers
  • Given two parallel lines cut by a transversal same side interior angles are congruent
    7·1 answer
  • There are 150 kangaroos at a wildlife park there are 66 female what percentage is female
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following expressions is equivalent to the one shown below?
    6·2 answers
  • The diameter of a cookie is 2 inches. If pico’s 3.14, what is the area of the cookie, rounded to the nearest 10th?
    14·1 answer
  • 3q + 3j <br>if q= 7 and j = 4​
    5·2 answers
  • Mario tried to solve an equation step by step.
    7·1 answer
  • Please help asap PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!