Answer:
Up selling
Explanation:
Up selling is a sales strategy. It is an attempt at making more sales using persuasion. It is different from cross-selling in that the customer is not asked to purchase a new item but only purchase a more expensive product or even simply an add-on to the already bought product he/she has.
While it is allowed in terms of ethical consideration to persuade the customer to purchase through up selling, it however becomes unethical when the sales person starts to push the sale. What is meant by pushing the sales refer to the use of half truth or falsehood to literally trick the customer into getting the product. This is an ethical issue and be tried in a capable court of law
Answer:
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Explanation:
Given in this case, Maxwell is applying "Universal Commercial Code (UCC)" division 2 provision, which defines all the goods and services.
A movable property, which can be sold from seller to the buyer at certain prices are called goods. Therefore, in this case, "Raw Cream" comes in the definition of goods, as it is directly sold to Maxwell by the grocery shop.
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
<span>Individuals with an internal locus of control are more likely to see their behavior as something they can adapt or change. This is a psychology term denoting that individuals take full responsibility of their actions and has the ability to will their actions because they know they could do it. Instead of asking for others’ support, the person owes up himself and changes himself for the better. Whatever he does is for himself however he does not stop himself from helping other people if needed. He does not fear failures because he knows he could get out from it.</span>
The impact on operating income for eliminating this business segment would be:
$54,900 decrease $135,100 decrease $52,900 decrease $190,000.
Answer:
c $4,450 U
Explanation:
The computation of the Variable overhead spending variance is shown below:
= (Standard variable overhead Rate × Actual Hour) - (Actual Rate × Actual Hour)
= ($12 × 400 units × 5.6 hours) - ($31,330)
= $26,880 - $31,330
= $4,450 Unfavorable
The (Actual Rate × Actual Hour) is also called as Actual variable overhead.
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
